A comparison between patient- and physician-reported late radiation toxicity in long-term prostate cancer survivors

Simple Summary Radiotherapy is widely used as treatment for localized prostate cancer. Due to a high incidence and a good survival after treatment, a large number of prostate cancer survivors are at risk of developing late radiation toxicity. Symptoms may significantly affect quality of life; therefore, the monitoring of toxicities and evaluating their impact are increasingly important matters. Toxicities have always been assessed by physicians, but there is a growing interest in the use of questionnaires to be completed by patients themselves, so-called patient-reported outcome measures. The aim of this study was to compare both outcomes in long-term prostate cancer survivors, and to determine which outcome correlates best with a biological predictor of late radiation toxicity. In symptomatic patients, we found a low agreement; patients assigned greater severity to symptoms than the trial physician assistant did. Neither outcome correlated with the biological predictor. Consideration of both perspectives seems warranted to provide the best care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are advocated for the monitoring of toxicity after radiotherapy. However, studies comparing physician- and patient-reported toxicity show low concordance. In this study, we compared physician- and patient-reported toxicity in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radiotherapy, and we determined the correlation with a presumable risk factor for late toxicity: gamma-H2AX foci decay ratio (FDR). Patients formerly included in a prospective study were invited to participate in this new study, comprising one questionnaire and one call with a trial physician assistant. Concordance was calculated for seven symptoms. Gamma-H2AX FDRs were determined in ex vivo irradiated lymphocytes in a previous analysis. Associations between FDR and long-term prevalence of toxicity were assessed using univariable logistic regression analyses. The 101 participants had a median follow-up period of 9 years. Outcomes were discordant in 71% of symptomatic patients; in 21%, the physician-assessed toxicity (using CTCAE) was higher, and, in 50%, the patients reported higher toxicity. We did not find a correlation between presence of toxicity at long-term follow-up and FDR. In conclusion, patients assigned greater severity to symptoms than the trial physician assistant did. Consideration of both perspectives may be warranted to provide the best care.Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio

Temperature and thermal dose during radiotherapy and hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer are related to clinical outcome and thermal toxicity: a systematic review

Objective: Hyperthermia therapy (HT), heating tumors to 40–45 °C, is a known radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sensitizer. The additional benefit of HT to RT for recurrent breast cancer has been proven in multiple randomized trials. However, published outcome after RT + HT varies widely. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether there is a relationship between achieved HT dose and clinical outcome and thermal toxicity for patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Method: Four databases, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov, were searched with the terms breast, radiotherapy, hyperthermia therapy and their synonyms. Final search was performed on 3 April 2019. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review, reporting on 2330 patients with breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Results: Thirty-two HT parameters were tested for a relationship with clinical outcome. In studies reporting a relationship, the relationship was significant for complete response in 10/15 studies, in 10/13 studies for duration of local control, in 2/2 studies for overall survival and in 7/11 studies for thermal toxicity. Patients who received high thermal dose had on average 34% (range 27%–53%) more complete responses than patients who received low thermal dose. Patients who achieved higher HT parameters had increased odds/probability on improved clinical outcome and on thermal toxicity. Conclusion: Temperature and thermal dose during HT had significant influence on complete response, duration of local control, overall survival and thermal toxicity of patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Higher temperature and thermal dose improved outcome, while higher maximum temperature increased incidence of thermal toxicity

Relating anatomical variations and patient features with dose-reconstruction accuracy of a 3D dose-reconstruction approach using CT scans of recently-treated children

Purpose Reconstructing 3D dose distributions for pre-1990 pediatric 2D radiotherapy plans is challenging, but key to research on late adverse effects. We studied the relation between dosimetric accuracy, anatomical variation, and other patient features of a 3D dose-reconstruction approach using CT scans of recently-treated patients, rather than phantoms. Materials and methods CT-scans of 22 Wilms’ tumor patients (age:2.5-5.3yrs; n boys/girls:11/11) treated between 2004 and 2015 were included. Two clinical plans as applied to a 4-year-old boy and girl with a left-sided Wilms’ tumor served as references. Each plan was applied to the CT scans of the other 21 patients, adjusted to correct for anatomical differences as visible in digitally-reconstructed-radiographs, and the resulting dose was calculated. Deviations in reconstructed dose, with respect to the reference dose, in organs-at-risk (spinal cord, right kidney, liver, and spleen) were characterized by the mean dose error normalized by the prescribed dose (DEmean). Deviations in organs’ location relative to a reference point (\Delta O_loc) and in organs’ shape captured by the Dice coefficient (DC) were calculated. We estimated the Pearson’s correlation between DEmean, on the one hand, and O­loc, DC, gender, age, height, and weight, on the other hand. Results Average(range) DEmean values were: spinal cord:3(0-8)%; right kidney:6(0-20)%; liver:9(0-20)%; and spleen:23(0-80)%. DC and DEmean in the right kidney were moderately negatively correlated (r2=0.41). DEmean in the liver was uncorrelated with any o

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based and conventional measurements for proton beam therapy of uveal melanoma

Objective: Conventionally, ocular proton therapy (PT) is planned using measurements obtained by an ophthalmologist using ultrasound, fundoscopy, biometry, and intraoperative assessments. Owing to the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of uveal melanoma (UM), it is possible to acquire high-resolution 3-dimensional images of the eye, providing the opportunity to incorporate MRI in ocular PT planning. In this study, we described how these measurements can be obtained using MRI, compared the MRI-based measurements with conventional ophthalmic measurements, and identified potential pitfalls for both modalities. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Data from 23 consecutive patients with UM treated with PT were retrospectively evaluated. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of axial length, tumor height and basal diameter, and marker-tumor distances were compared with the conventional ophthalmic measurements, and discrepancies were evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting. Main Outcome Measures: Tumor prominence and basal diameters on MRI and ultrasound, axial length on MRI and biometry, tumor-marker distances on MRI and measured intraoperatively. Results: The mean absolute differences of the tumor height and basal diameter measurements between ultrasound and MRI were 0.57 mm and 1.44 mm, respectively. Larger absolute differences in height and basal diameter were observed when the full tumor extent was not visible on ultrasound (0.92 mm and 1.67 mm, respectively) compared with when the full tumor extent was visible (0.44 mm and 1.15 mm, respectively). When the full tumor was not visible on ultrasound, MRI was considered more reliable. Tumor-marker distances measured using MRI and intraoperative techniques differed Biological, physical and clinical aspects of cancer treatment with ionising radiatio